WDAY’s Uniform Adjusted EPS’ is substantially greater than as-reported earnings suggest, and expected to grow materially, implying the firm may not be a good short position
- WDAY’s profitability is materially distorted by accounting for R&D and stock option expense
- As such, their UAFRS EPS’ is expected to be $0.19 in Q2 and $0.86 in the next year, not -$0.48 and -$2.01, respectively, as GAAP accounting metrics report
- At current valuations, markets are embedding expectations for 52% EPS’ growth annually, which is substantially lower than analyst projections for +90% annual EPS’ growth, warranting equity upside should the firm meet estimates
- With over 10% of the firm’s outstanding shares being held short, the potential for a short-squeeze is high, elevating risk for short-sellers
Workday, Inc. (WDAY) is expected to release Q2 2018 GAAP EPS of -$0.48 on 8/30, which would represent a $0.07 improvement relative to EPS of -$0.55 in the same period last year. Moreover, full-year estimates are also bearish, with projections for EPS to decline by $0.05 in the next four quarters, from -$1.96 in the four-quarter period ended Q1 2018, to -$2.01. Despite this bearish outlook, shares have rallied towards all-time highs, up 55% YTD, as investors have clung to optimism about the firm’s future growth prospects, despite consistently negative GAAP EPS. That said, short sellers have begun to take notice, with 10.45% of the firm’s outstanding shares being held short as of the writing of this report.
However, after making appropriate adjustments under Uniform Adjusted Financial Reporting Standards (UAFRS), it is apparent that profitability is far higher than traditional EPS implies, and is expected to continue to grow going forward.
Specifically, under UAFRS, Uniform EPS (EPS’) is actually expected to be $0.19 in Q2 2018, a $1.09 increase from -$0.90 in the same period last year, and is also expected to grow by $1.10 in the next four quarters, following a dramatic $0.76 collapse in the four-quarter period ended Q1 2018. EPS’ is expected to reach $0.86 in the next year, a material rebound from -$0.24 in the last year, and a far-cry from the consistently negative EPS levels that GAAP accounting metrics report. This suggests that valuations are less aggressive than they seem at first glance, and WDAY may not be the prime short opportunity that it initially appears.
The quarterly results show a similar trend, with EPS’ expected to remain positive, and well above as-reported EPS going forward, as it has the last three quarters, and, should EPS’ continue to grow as it is expected to, this suggests the firm may not be a good short position.
UAFRS, Uniform Adjusted Financial Reporting Standards, call for removal of distortions from issues like the treatment of R&D and stock option expense. Once removed, it is apparent that WDAY’s profitability is far greater than as-reported metrics suggest, indicating that the firm is not quite the short play that as-reported valuations suggest, which can have material implications for shares at current valuations.
UAFRS vs. As-Reported EPS
Investors make major decisions about which companies to own based on quarterly company earnings, the most common metric mentioned in traditional corporate investment analysis.
However, more often than not, the earnings that companies report in any given quarter can swing wildly and lead investors to completely wrong conclusions, because GAAP and IFRS rules force management to report results in ways that are not representative of the real operating performance of the business.
While there is a case to be made that some management teams can use “creative accounting” to adjust numbers, the research would show that more often than not, the real problem is with the accounting rules themselves, not management’s use of them.
The UAFRS Advisory Council has identified over 130 accounting and financial reporting inconsistencies (some of which can be found here), of which several have material impact on WDAY’s financials.
Impact of Adjustments from GAAP to UAFRS
Two key UAFRS adjustments have the largest impact on WDAY’s income statement, to get from earnings to UAFRS-adjusted earnings. These are related to R&D and stock option expense.
GAAP and to a lesser extent IFRS (which allows for capitalization of a portion of R&D expense) treat R&D investments as expenses, when in actuality these are investments in a company’s future operations. They may be good investments or bad investments, but it’s hard to think of R&D as cost of goods sold.
In the case of R&D expense, this is often a multi-year investment in a firm’s future offerings. Expensing R&D violates the basic matching rule of accounting, that expenses should be recognized in the period the related revenue is recognized.
Expensing R&D can also dramatically increase earnings volatility, as the timing of R&D related to multi-year projects can create lumpy earnings volatility, distorting understanding of a company’s real profitability.
Additionally, WDAY has had material non-cash stock option expense since the company was founded. This is treated as an expense to the company in accounting statements, when it is actually a way for the company to give employees an ownership stake in the company. As such, this non-cash expense should be treated as dilution to equity holders and another claim against the Enterprise Value of the firm, as opposed to it being treated as an annual expense. This is especially true as, unless the company uses cash to buy shares (to suppress dilution for equity holders from the option grants being exercised), there is no cash impact on the company.
UAFRS-reporting adjusts for these traditional accounting distortions by treating all R&D as investing cash flows and re-bucketing stock option expense into enterprise value. These simple reclassifications remove a tremendous amount of accounting noise related to investment activities and improves investors understanding of the operating earnings of a business.
Greater-than-reported EPS’ and expectations for growth suggest high valuations may be justified
At current prices, WDAY is trading at a 179.2x traditional forward P/E, which, when considering recently negative as-reported earnings, may indicate an overvalued firm. However, after making the requisite adjustments, it is apparent that the firm is actually trading at a UAFRS-based P/E of 119.2x, which, while still very expensive, is not completely outside the realm of similarly aggressive growth stocks.
Specifically, when considering the fact that EPS’ is expected to grow considerably going forward, valuations are less aggressive than they appear. At a 119.2x UAFRS-based P/E, markets are embedding expectations for annual EPS’ growth of 52%, which is still markedly lower than long-term analyst estimates for +90% annual EPS’ growth. As such, WDAY would only need to maintain growth in line with analysts’ estimates to warrant equity upside, and, should that occur, a short-squeeze could quickly materialize.
By using Uniform Adjusted Financial Reporting Standards (UAFRS), investors see a cleaner picture that distorted GAAP and IFRS metrics cannot show. By standardizing financial reporting consistently across time and across companies, corporate performance and valuation metrics improve dramatically. Comparability of a company’s earnings over time, trends in corporate profitability and comparability in earnings power and earnings growth across close competitors and different sectors becomes far more relevant and reliable.
To find out more about Workday, Inc. and how their performance and market expectations compare to peers, click here to access the open beta of the Valens Research database.
Our Chief Investment Strategist, Joel Litman, chairs the Valens Research Committee, which is responsible for this article. Professor Litman is regarded globally for his expertise in financial statement analysis, fundamental research, and particularly Uniform Accounting, UAFRS.