Investor Essentials Daily

The housing market today has one crucial difference to 2008

August 16, 2021

After a year of record low housing inventory and climbing prices, the news cycle is occupied with the risk of 2021 being a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.

With access to easy money, the housing market saw ballooning access prices, and when the spigot was closed, a large crash followed. Many wonder if low rates and stimulus are acting as a similar lever to housing prices now.

Today, we are going to dive into the math behind the current housing market and understand if the risks are the same.

Investor Essentials Daily:
The Monday Macro Report
Powered by Valens Research

The steep surge in commodity prices keeps hitting the headlines these days.

Lumber, semiconductor chips, gasoline, grocery store staples, and even the lattes sold at your local coffee shop cost more now.

The used car market, known for its rapid depreciation, not appreciation, is up more than 40%.

Much of this inflation is transitory, with a better picture slowly coming in. The several “nightmare months” at the pandemic’s start shocked the delicate global balance of supply and demand. As our economy largely relies on “just in time” logistics, the consequences are still being drawn out.

Just-in-time is when companies order their inputs to arrive the day they need them to avoid filling warehouses with materials.

With the just-in-time model so sensitive to supply shocks, small delays cascaded down the supply chain and caused mass shortages. The current supply chain shortages and the post-pandemic surge in consumer demand are causing prices to increase across the board.

Thankfully, most signs point to it being temporary.

More importantly, this isn’t the “by the book” inflation that worries economists. That type of economic concern refers to currency devaluation amid a flailing economy.

However, the asset class most dear to the middle class might not be so lucky.

Home prices have been on a nonstop tear, even before the pandemic. But the pandemic added fuel to the fire.

According to Zillow estimates, the typical home in Dallas sold for nearly $262,000 in 2020 to around $306,000 this year. This reflects not just the listing values of homes but actual transaction data.

Home values in the “Big D” rose 17%, and it’s not an isolated incident but a fairly tame case. It pales compared to the rise in prices in popular locations for the new remote worker, such as Truckee, California.

In Truckee, a real estate agency reported that transacted single-family home prices shot up by nearly 90% in one year.

Many people are understandably spooked. It seems as though we’ve been here before, riding the wave of rapidly rising home values into another dark recessionary abyss.

But as the data shows, not everything is the same as in the mid-2000s.

Rising home prices don’t tell the whole story. Comparable metrics of affordability can tell us if homes are becoming more expensive than other options.

The rental market, being the only viable alternative to ownership, is the logical place to look. By comparing the ownership costs with the proceeds from renting, we can check whether the housing market is overheated.

This can be rolled up into the aggregate price-to-rent multiple for housing. At the peak of the subprime mortgage bubble, price-to-rent was 41 times. In other words, it would have taken 41 years of collecting market rent for a property to pay back its value, assuming prices and rental rates held steady.

Today, price-to-rent is at 29 times, lower than it was in 2006.

Another way to think about this is in terms of yield. The 41 times price-to-rent multiple in 2006 meant rental homes yielded their owners, on average, 2.4%. Today’s yield is a better 3.4% on a cash basis.

However, the cash basis is mostly irrelevant because people don’t buy homes with cash. They tend to use leverage. Once you add the cost-of-debt variable into the mix, the differences between 15 years ago and today are more evident.

At the beginning of 2006, the average 30-year mortgage rate was 6.2%. Given that the rental yield was only 2.4%, purchasing a home as a rental unit was generally a losing proposition. You would be losing nearly 4% per year on interest.

Today the average long-term secured mortgage is around 2.8%, and the rental yield is 3.4%. That makes rental properties more profitable today.

The same strategy that would have lost you roughly 4 percentage points per year would be a viable investment today.

Today, the economics of buying a home still makes sense.

Prices are rising because of shifting demand trends and a general lack of home availability. Conclusion: We’re not in a bubble yet.

Best regards,

Joel Litman & Rob Spivey

Chief Investment Strategist &
Director of Research
at Valens Research